The Sprinky post received quite a number of comments. I appreciate hearing from you. For those of you who have requested, there is a photo of Sprinky available in motion. He is in the 2008 album. If you look closely you can see the water swirling in front of him.
On to other business, it has been a crazy couple of days. I am starting to get my feet wet in the practice of law. They are breaking us in quickly with a week of orientation. They might as well call it, “The Crash Course in Writing Briefs”. I am sure I have little or no idea what is really in store but I am enjoying it so far.
We have heard from the President of the Oklahoma Bar Association giving us advice. Justice Yvonne Kauger of the Supreme Court of Oklahoma swore us in. Our professors have done all they can to get the point across we need to study hard. I have found 4 other LDS students with whom I have already studied and car-pooled. Things are looking good. The comments of one professor already have me thinking in my moments of down time. He told us that we have to make the decision we are going to pass the bar exam now. Every decision from this point out will be in conjunction with that decision. Shall I watch TV or study the law. Shall I do this or study the law. Pointing out every indiscretion could keep us from learning and weaken our position of passing the bar. Wow, for a test more than 3 years down the road, my seconds now will matter? Looking at it in that light, we have either been preparing or not for the past 20 years haven’t we?
Then again, the scriptures teach us to think like this regularly for the bar exam, the Final Bar. With a capital F. Every day, every thought, every action, every desire is making up our constitutions for the final day. The thought of our little moments now making a big difference later are not new to Saints. D&C reminds us to labor in what is called today, not for tomorrow. Alma refers to live as a probationary state. Even President Monson in his maxims talks of acting today for in living for tomorrow we end up with a bunch of empty yesterdays.
I head back to my studying. Just this night, I have learned TB centers are considered nuisances in close proximity to others. Undertakes as well. Cemeteries and mausoleums are not. Slaughterhouses are not. Who knows what the next case will teach me. Obviously we are learning about nuisances and the legal rules applying. This is just a class to teach us how to read cases and brief them, this isn’t even a real class yet! However, the most hilarious line tonight was about how the people wanting a mausoleum don’t have the grounds to sue. Obviously, if they had the grounds, they wouldn’t want a mausoleum! I went back and reread the statement and saw I read it wrong, but dang it was funny at the moment.
You want to know what is even more sad? I have been doing some genealogical research on a couple of lines in Washington. All the cases I referenced are from the State of Washington. This mausoleum is from Tacoma, Washington and the case is in 1920. My first thought was, “I wonder if there are any Andress’, Jonas’, or Carpenter’s in this Mausoleum?” The slaughterhouse case was from south of Colville, Washington. Colville just happens to be the town where I have several individuals who disappear and I cannot find where or what happened to them. Not to say the slaughterhouse is my answer, but I have personally been to all these locations in the past 6 months! Perhaps that is what is making the first few days so interesting.